Re: Updated site.vsl and site_printable.vsl

[Jon Stevens]

on 8/23/01 2:38 PM, "Attila Szegedi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> However, I'm still puzzled: why does CVS download some files correctly even
> without explicit --lf (i.e. site.vsl had no extra 0d bytes in it) and some
> not?

Weird WinCVS issues is my guess...

I don't think this is a CVS problem, it is a WinCVS problem...

-jon