Know if there's any particular reason that they chose not to embed the Velocity engine directly (or maybe they did)?
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > geirm 01/11/17 09:51:32 > > Modified: xdocs index.xml > Log: > News of resin's support of a Velocity-compatible syntax for #if() et al. > > Revision Changes Path > 1.42 +8 -0 jakarta-velocity/xdocs/index.xml > > Index: index.xml > =================================================================== > RCS file: /home/cvs/jakarta-velocity/xdocs/index.xml,v > retrieving revision 1.41 > retrieving revision 1.42 > diff -u -r1.41 -r1.42 > --- index.xml 2001/11/10 15:10:59 1.41 > +++ index.xml 2001/11/17 17:51:32 1.42 > @@ -69,6 +69,14 @@ > > <section name="Velocity News"> > > +<p> > +<strong>Hey, Maybe We're On The Right Track After All...</strong> > +<blockquote> > +Give <a href="http://www.caucho.com/products/resin/ref/velocity.xtp";>this</a> > +a read. Of course, there are plenty of reasons why you still want to use > +Velocity in creating your J2EE web applications, but this is nice to see anyway. > +</blockquote> > +</p> > > <p> > <strong>Velocidoc Released</strong> -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
