On 11/18/01 3:17 PM, "Daniel Rall" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Know if there's any particular reason that they chose not to embed the > Velocity engine directly (or maybe they did)? Reading carefully, it doesn't appear that they did. They didn't go as deep as I thought initially - however, I haven't played with it yet, so this is a SWAG on my part geir (SWAG := Scientific Wild-Ass Guess) > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > >> geirm 01/11/17 09:51:32 >> >> Modified: xdocs index.xml >> Log: >> News of resin's support of a Velocity-compatible syntax for #if() et al. >> >> Revision Changes Path >> 1.42 +8 -0 jakarta-velocity/xdocs/index.xml >> >> Index: index.xml >> =================================================================== >> RCS file: /home/cvs/jakarta-velocity/xdocs/index.xml,v >> retrieving revision 1.41 >> retrieving revision 1.42 >> diff -u -r1.41 -r1.42 >> --- index.xml 2001/11/10 15:10:59 1.41 >> +++ index.xml 2001/11/17 17:51:32 1.42 >> @@ -69,6 +69,14 @@ >> >> <section name="Velocity News"> >> >> +<p> >> +<strong>Hey, Maybe We're On The Right Track After All...</strong> >> +<blockquote> >> +Give <a >> href="http://www.caucho.com/products/resin/ref/velocity.xtp";>this</a> >> +a read. Of course, there are plenty of reasons why you still want to use >> +Velocity in creating your J2EE web applications, but this is nice to see >> anyway. >> +</blockquote> >> +</p> >> >> <p> >> <strong>Velocidoc Released</strong> > > -- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > -- Geir Magnusson Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] System and Software Consulting "They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." - Benjamin Franklin -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
