On 2/12/02 2:23 PM, "Nathan Bubna" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hey Geir et. al., > > I just went through the process of developing a struts/velocity app, and i > must say the vel-struts codebase is woefully lacking at the moment. In > fact, the velocity-tools-struts package is currently so ugly, i didn't use > any of it in my app. (No offense intended to the authors :-) But, rather > than just complain, i figured i should chip in some of the stuff i ended up > writing. Hm. > > Attached are four classes that would probably fit best with the view package > (they are not related to Struts) and one that aspires to go in the > vel-struts package (MessageTool). Also included is a velocity template that > demonstrates the use of a couple of the tools. I know some of this > functionality has already been implemented (especially in the case of the > vel-struts class), but seeing as the current codebase is extremely young and > umm...unrefined :-), i think some rigorous competition can only help, right? Sure - can any of it be combined? Competition is good, but we also want to limit the confusion to users - avoid major overlap (minor isn't so bad...) > Anyway, i found developing with these attached tools to be quite pleasant > and i feel inclined to share. That's great. We will pull back the Commons 'rupert' as well and get this going. -- Geir Magnusson Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] System and Software Consulting You're going to end up getting pissed at your software anyway, so you might as well not pay for it. Try Open Source. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
