> > As said above: There are some who want to contribute but cannot > > because their patches are not reviewed or there is no development > > plan. > > so what to do, to turn out of this dead end street? > I think Velocity is it worth to find a way out. It's
Yes, indeed. But it really lost ground in comparison with other template languages like FreeMarker. So it is really time to do something about it. > no surprise that no one is interested to submit patches > if these patches don't have a chance to beeing accepted > because no one reviews them! I really don't think that > there are too few contributors, but someone has to > lead the developing process. But who should do that? I must admit, that I sometimes think of forking a new project on SourceForge or whatever. But that is bullshit since the Velocity-Community is quite huge (but it is decreasing I think - the lists are not as active as they have been). What about if all the current commiters say a word about their thoughts on velocity and on the future of velocity? I know that there are some besides Geir... Peter > mike > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
