Friday, February 28, 2003, 9:31:12 AM, xMySign for Velocity wrote: >> As said above: There are some who want to contribute but cannot >> because their patches are not reviewed or there is no development >> plan. > > so what to do, to turn out of this dead end street?
IMO the project has to look for new lead developer. When the leader lost his interest or simply he has no time to fulfill his task, the project needs a new lead. Yes, it is hard to find somebody, I guess, but as far as it is not stated cleanly and explicitly and it is not clean for everybody, you have even less chance to find somebody. Maybe you can even mention this one the Index page, but of course the candidate has to prove his skills on the dev list... yeah, sure, not an easy thing. But, for example, it has already happen with F<censored/>r, AFAIK for 2 times, and I'm sure that the product would not be in such good shape as now without it. Of course, the people who should actually initiate this (i.e. to find new lead) is the current lead, Geir. And I have to stress that the idea is not that Geir has to go -- in practice he has already gone anyway -- but that somebody has to come. > I think Velocity is it worth to find a way out. It's > no surprise that no one is interested to submit patches > if these patches don't have a chance to beeing accepted > because no one reviews them! I really don't think that > there are too few contributors, but someone has to > lead the developing process. -- Best regards, Daniel Dekany --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
