I'm a +1 on this. Not a big deal, but makes sense.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Daniel L. Rall" <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, June 06, 2005 11:53 PM
Subject: Re: Subversion strategy
On Thu, 2004-12-09 at 09:13 +0000, Henning P. Schmiedehausen wrote:
"Daniel L. Rall" <[email protected]> writes:
>As suggested by Henning, this is what I originally imagined:
>jakarta/
> velocity/
> dvsl/
> tools/
> core/
>If no one has a problem with that structure, I'll make the changes.
+1 (obviously) :-)
I will be pursuing this Real Soon Now (tm) unless I hear an objection.
Afterwards, developers will need to 'svn switch' your working copies to
avoid having every file in them disappear out from under you.
- Dan
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
