On Tue, 27 Sep 2005, Henning P. Schmiedehausen wrote: > Daniel Rall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > >Henning, have you seen a spot where it would be reasonable to pass in the > >directory base name as some sort of configuration parameter? Seems odd to > >leave it hard-coded like this. > > Well, we can extend all the test cases from BaseTestCase and set it > there. However, these are just unit tests which are run in a > controlled environment and they work both ant and maven driven. > > Any particular reason to change it further?
No functional reason, no. However, if we'd had the base path set in a single place before (like it should've been), you wouldn't have had to bother changing it in this round of refactoring. So, it's more of a code consolidation tingle for me... - Dan p.s. Thanks for doing that refactoring. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
