*Plonk* On Fri, 2006-03-24 at 18:05 +0100, Jonathan Revusky wrote: > Daniel Dekany wrote: > > Thursday, March 23, 2006, 5:43:32 AM, Gonzalo Diethelm wrote: > > > > > >>On Thu, 2006-03-23 at 01:16 +0100, Jonathan Revusky wrote: > >> > >>>I mean to say basically.... be men, grow some balls.... :-) > >> > >>This post proves (to me) that you not only lack the common sense to > >>refrain from posting where you have been repeatedly told "we don't care > >>for your opinions", but also that you are a rude, insulting, vulgar, > >>ill-mannered person. > > > > > > Well I don't agree with Jonathan on this topic, because I think that > > doing a new behavior optional allows people to review the templates > > when they want to, while they still can use the other improvements... > > Well, the basic thing is that if it makes sense to fix this definitively > for 2.0 (i.e. make the correct behavior the default) then it would make > sense moving from 1.4-> 1.5. It's still quite a major version upgrade. > > The same transitional pain gets imposed either way. It's better for it > to be sooner rather than later. > > > > > But, your reaction doesn't make sense either, or rather it looks > > pretended... You see, if you are really this sensible, you could not > > survive in this world too long, as you would die be seeing all the > > horror around you (I mean, real bad and disgusting things, not just > > hearing bit strong language)... So what this meant to be, please? > > > Well, yeah, of course he's pretending to be soooo offended. :-) It's > quite comical. > > Regards, > > Jonathan Revusky > -- > lead developer, FreeMarker project, http://freemarker.org/ > > > > > > >>If I ever had any curiosity for your product(s), I > >>can assure you that, from now on, I will make sure I never go anywhere > >>near them. > >> > >> > >>>Regards, > >>> > >>>Jonathan Revusky > >> > >>Trying to sugar coat? I won't buy it, no sir. > >> > >> > >>>lead developer, FreeMarker project, http://freemarker.org/ > >> > >>I truly hope you do really well with your project(s) and product(s). I > >>won't touch them with a flag pole if I have any say in the matter. > > > > > > The question is, who do you cause harm by that... Anyway, if you hate > > Jonathan, then why do you "truly" hope that things are going well for > > him??? (Well sorry for being this OT, but this pretence that most > > people do, this "oooh I'm a sooo sensitive and liberal and nice guy", > > and then you look around the world what they do in reality... Slowly I > > go toward that I don't trust people who never says anything vulgar. > > Real saints are rare.) > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >
-- Gonzalo Diethelm [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
