> > I'd love to see the Velocity introspector to move closer to the
actual
> > bean spec (though it probably predates it...).
The introspector was built to be more lenient than the bean spec, so for
example, Thingy.foo will work with a hashmap by also trying
object.get("foo"). This is extremely useful for passing in disposable
value objects.
My opinion, the Bean Spec is for programmers... the last time I tried to
explain a "bean" to an HTML/Tempalte author, it wasn't pretty. :-)
> No, I disagree. Velocity should be more accepting rather than less.
Yep.
> (I've previously argued we should make the entire language
> case-insensitive).
Interesting... I could go +1 for that.
> Many template writers aren't programmers - let's keep things simple.
+1 Even when the template author IS a programmer -- I still want to keep
templates simple. :-)
Tim
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]