"Tim Colson \(tcolson\)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > >> (I've previously argued we should make the entire language
>> >> case-insensitive).
>> >Interesting... I could go +1 for that.
>> Why? How about a hash map that contains "foo", "Foo", "FOO" and
>> "foO". What would
>Hmm... well, for hashmap, the introspector passes verbatim whatever it
>sees (as far as I know)... so it would still probably work.
so
$foo.xxx
$foo.XXX
are the same if this happens to be a property access and
$foo.xxx
$foo.XXX
are different if this is a hashmap access.
Now that would be "gotcha!". ;-)
Regards
Henning
--
Dipl.-Inf. (Univ.) Henning P. Schmiedehausen INTERMETA GmbH
[EMAIL PROTECTED] +49 9131 50 654 0 http://www.intermeta.de/
RedHat Certified Engineer -- Jakarta Turbine Development -- hero for hire
Linux, Java, perl, Solaris -- Consulting, Training, Development
4 - 8 - 15 - 16 - 23 - 42
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
