Hi

>From my personal point of view, the documentation on how to use velocity is 
well done but I think the documentation on the installation issues, running 
examples and stuff is a bit not user friendly as the docs are scattered over 
the place. I dont know but maybe that is how software works..just have to 
get used to it..

But it is really gratifying to know there are very nice and helpful people 
like Andrew Mason around to lend a helping hand :)

Regards
David

On 9/9/05, Andrew Mason <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 
> In what way is it really really bad?
> 
> It took me only a few hours of looking at the docs to make a very usable 
> app
> with velocity? There are a few advanced things that could be made clearer, 
> or
> added i guess, but most "newbies" don't encounter this stuff immediately.
> 
> I'm not part of the dev or documentation team my self, but I think 
> velocity is
> quite a well documented project personally so I'd be keen to hear which 
> parts
> you found "difficult". I am sufficiently advanced in velocity that i could
> probably help you write up the parts of the documentation your having 
> issues
> with.
> 
> regards
> Andrew M
> 
> 
> .
> On Fri September 9 2005 3:53 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > May be it is because I'm a newbie, but your velocity's documentation is
> > really really bad.
> > !
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> 


-- 
cheers
Xingfu

"Great dreamers' dreams are never fulfilled, they are always transcended "
-Prof Hocky Chio mi mi

Reply via email to