NEEDLESS OR NEEDLE-LESS???
lol....I do that same typo all the time!
-------------- Original message --------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thank you Tony for keeping us all up to date with the conference!! A question though is burning in my mind. I don't recall, from the disscussion we had on the list this spring/summer, about a brand specific needless connector being responsible for for the increase in CRBSI. So could you please tell us which connector(s) are in question? What is the reason that belies a particular valve design, that makes it prone to causing CRBSI?
Peter Marino RN BSN
----- Original Message -----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sunday, January 15, 2006 12:06 am
Subject: AVA conference, DAY 3"The topic was needleless connectors. They discussed the qualities of a needleless device that would contribute to maintaining a safe fluid pathway. The premise is that the association of increased catheter related infections with valves is likely a brand specific problem and not a wholesale problem of the device category as Drs Maki and Jarviss data might have led one to believe."
> Tony West, RN, CRNI
> Healix, Inc.
> Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] or [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> SMS: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cell: 214-674-4848
>
