|
Your I-look has measuring
ability so there is no guess work in what size the vessel is. Of course
when the depth is greater, the vein looks smaller, but the machine accommodates
for that and it adjusts the size accordingly.
When placing PICC's I like to
decrease the blood flow no more that 50 % in the vessel. If the patient is
hypercoagulable, then 50% is too much and I will go for less. A 3F
PICC is 1 mm while a 6F is 2mm. Therefore, when measuring the vessel size,
I can decide how large the vein has to be based on the catheter size and
the underlying coagulability factors of the patient. If the vein is too
small at one place, the I simply move up the arm until it is large enough to
accommodate the catheter.
The Site Rite 5 is pretty
cool too. The vein is magnified so much that it is pretty easy to see the
approximate size of the vein by using the "hash marks" on the side of the
screen.
I like to document the size
of the vessel when charting, especially for placing the triple lumen by
Bard. I try to look at liability issues, and think that I would be a
little better off in a court of law, if I had actually measured the vessel size
and then decided if that patient could safely accommodate that size of
catheter. That's just my personal opinion though.
You can't go wrong with
either machine as far as being safe with measuring. Only difference is
that the I-look will give you an exact size. One last thing......I
measuring the vein without the tourniquet. And I measure in the smallest
area of the vein. I don't really care what size the vessel is with
a tourniquet, since the PICC is in the arm the whole time without a
tourniquet.
|
- Re: Vessel size on ultrasound Cheryl
- RE: Vessel size on ultrasound Anna Liang
- RE: Vessel size on ultrasound DS BROADHURST
- Re: Vessel size on ultrasound Leighannbowe
- Re: Vessel size on ultrasound Leighannbowe
- Re: Vessel size on ultrasound Anna Liang
