I must respectfully disagree with your first paragraph.   There have been huge numbers of LTC law suits, maybe not in your location but throughout the country.  Families claim all sorts of things are due to negligence.... bed sores, falls, malnutrition, worsening of an existing medical condition,    It has been my experience  that many people DO NOT   hesitate to sue  for negligence.  I even saw a case filed that alleged a 98 year old lady's death was the result of negligence  --- rather than her medical conditions and aging process.
 
It is rare that a law suit is filed during residency in LTC>... most times it is after discharge or demise of the party. 
 
Facilities are obligated to let families know there is a grievance process - even Federal mandates that have  created  a process/assistance for concerns.... OMBUDSMEN are advocates for residents in LTC>..  Contact information must be posted in the facility to allow the family/ resident know their rights and how to seek assistance.
 
I understand that retaliation can happen, but it should not and  if carried out, becomes additional allegations when filing suit..
 

Ann  - RN, JD, CRNI, LHRM

 
 
 -----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, May 19, 2006 10:08 PM
To: Dianne Sim
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: RE: How many times?

Reality is that SNFs are very rarely sued for negligence, unless there is a death. And families and patients will not complain because they fear realiation, these patients are not going to be there for a few days, they are usually there for a few months to years.  It is a different mindset.  They do the best they can with the limited funds they have, always cutting corners.  Best practice is never considered if costs are involved.

In regards to this gentleman, I would call the MD and Director of nursing and explain the risks of a broken PICC, as well as the fact that you tried that route and it was not successful.  I think 3 tries should really be the max---does he have another place to reinsert at this point?

I really like the idea of a tunnelled cath to his back, that will definatly work.  Getting someone to pay for it would be the next big issue. 

You run the risk of if you refuse to place another PICC the pt will get sent to the ER and have a TLC placed either IJ or SC.  That is quick and easy access for an ER MD.

You can suggest PO meds such as ZYVOX, but there are reimbursement issues.  Although that would be much safer for the patient and SNF, so some may go along with it.

A port is really not an option--the pt will undoubtably pull out the needle and the needle will end up in the bed, and he will get stuck. Not to mention, some SNFs do not have nurses that are familiar with port management. You are then buying life long maintenance with this port, another thing SNFs would prefer not to pay for. And, when the patient deaccesses the port for the 50th time, clotting off will be an issue.

SNF patients, especially confused ones, are always a challenge.  I really feel PO is best whenever possible.

Get the MD and DON involved.

 



Chris Cavanaugh, CRNI

----- Original Message -----
From: Dianne Sim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Friday, May 19, 2006 5:13 pm
Subject: RE: How many times?
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

> I think that the SNFs don't understand that they can be liable if
> they don't
> prevent injury to their patients (even if self-inflicted) by using
> restraints appropriately. Obviously all other options must have been
> explored, and exhausted, an MD order obtained, frequent checks of the
> patient done and documented.
>
>
>
> Dianne Sim RN
>
> CEO & President
>
>
>
> IV Assist, Inc.,
>
> 2675 Appian Way
>
> Pinole, CA 94564
>
> Phone: (510) 222-8403
>
> Fax: (510) 222-8277
>
> Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>
>
&g! t;
&g






*************************************************************
The information contained in this E-mail transmission is
intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom
it is addressed. It may contain privileged, confidential,
and protected health information.

If you received it in error, you are on notice of its status.
Please notify us immediately by reply e-mail and then please
delete this message from your system. Please do not copy it
or use it for any purposes, or disclose its contents to any
other person. To do so could violate state and Federal
privacy laws. Thank you for your cooperation.
Please contact the sender if you need assistance.

Reply via email to