why 'The Stat-Lock is part of the "sterile" dressing
change' ??

if a stat-lock is 3 cm from the site, why not just
clean technique?



--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

> The Stat-Lock is part of the "sterile" dressing
> change and it must be completely incorporated under
> a large transparent dressing--We place one steri
> strip (sterile tape) over the plastic snaps and one
> at the distal side (the edge closest to the AC) of
> the stat-lock then cover with a transparent
> dressing--We seal and reinforce the distal edge of
> the dressing with a split of 2 inch tape (perforated
> Medapore)  
> 
> --
> Robbin K. George RN 
> Vascular Access Resource 
> Alexandria Hospital Virginia 
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> 
> 
> -------------- Original message -------------- 
> Wrom: PWIGYOKSTTZRCLBDXRQBGJSNBOHMKHJYFMY
> 
> > What is the best way to achieve a truly occlusive 
> > dressing? We have two issues that make us question
> if 
> > you can ever get a truly occlusive dressing. . . 
> > the first is one that will be eliminated when we 
> > finally convert to inserting Power PICCs only.
> Right 
> > now, we use Groshongs and when there is extra 
> > catheter, what is the proper way to ensure 
> > occlusiveness (is that a word?). I try to make
> sure 
> > that all extra catheter remains under the
> dressing. 
> > Others have used 2 statlocks and left some of the 
> > catheter and the second statlock hanging out of
> the 
> > dressing. I don't like this practice for fear of
> the 
> > patient pulling it (which they will), but was 
> > wondering if there was a protocol. 
> > Secondly, when I use a statlock, I try to put it
> as 
> > close to the insertion site as possible, hoping to
> 
> > anchor it more securely. Others will put it a
> little 
> > further away and then the edge of the dressing
> goes 
> > over part of the statlock, but the entire statlock
> 
> > isn't covered. In fact, half of the clip is
> exposed. 
> > This makes for a dressing that is not "air-tight"
> and 
> > hence could let bacteria in. 
> > I know the answers to these questions already, but
> 
> > just wanted a little back-up for when I present it
> to 
> > my coworkers. 
> > Thanks! 
> > Kelly 
> > 
> > __________________________________________________
> 
> > Do You Yahoo!? 
> > Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam
> protection around 
> > http://mail.yahoo.com 
> > 
> > 


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 


Reply via email to