2012/1/20 Dirk Franke <[email protected]>:

> Die Lage ist - vorsichtig gesagt - mißlich. Aber ich glaube, es ist kein
> Grund jetzt sofort den Untergang des Abendlandes auszurufen.

Guten Morgen,

ich möchte euch - damit es nicht unbemerkt bleibt - die Mitteilung der
Foundation zu der Golan v. Holder-Entscheidung zuschicken. Darin ist
noch nicht eine konkrete Handlungsempfehlung für die Projekte wie
Wikimedia Commons enthalten.

Grüße,
Mathias

----


This morning, the U.S. Supreme Court handed down its decision in the
seminal case of Golan v. Holder. Striking a significant blow to the
strength and stability of the public domain, the Court upheld a law
that took a considerable number of foreign works out of the public
domain and placed them back under copyright protection.

This important decision underscores the extent of the power Congress
has to decide and control what information is available to the public.
Furthermore, this decision demonstrates the reasons we cannot rely on
the Court alone to defend our access to knowledge.

In the face of this disappointing news, we are all reminded to speak
up when Congress acts against the public good.

Today, the Wikipedia community has taken a strong and united stand
against SOPA and PIPA, legislation that are also attacks on free
knowledge and an open Internet.

Today, we say ‘Enough’ to Congress.


FAQ

What is the Golan v. Holder case?

In 1994, as part of the Uruguay Round Agreements, Congress passed a
law in a misguided attempt to reconcile U.S. and foreign copyright by
taking works out of the U.S. public domain that were still under
copyright in their source country. The case was brought by re-users of
the works previously in the public domain: educators, community
orchestras, and artists who relied on the freely available works for
their own projects and could no longer use those works because of the
law.

In a 6-2 decision, the Court in Golan held that the U.S. Constitution
does not prevent Congress from “restoring” copyright to works
previously in the public domain.  Justice Stephen Breyer, in his
dissent joined by Justice Samuel Alito, noted that the purpose of
copyright is to incentivize authors and artists to create new works,
but “[t]he statute before [the Court], however, does not encourage
anyone to produce a single new work.”

Why is this case important?

Today’s decision marks the first time that the Court has ever
indicated that Congress not only has the power to extend the life of a
copyright, but take works out of the public domain and place them back
under copyright protection. Works like Pablo Picasso’s “Guernica,”
Sergei Prokofiev’s “Peter and the Wolf,” and J.R.R. Tolkien’s “The
Hobbit” have been taken out of the public domain as a result of this
law and this decision. This newly declared power that Congress now
wields threatens the stability of the public domain and puts those who
rely on it at risk.

Why does this matter to Wikipedia or other Wikimedia projects?

Wikimedia projects are some of the largest repositories of public
domain material in the world. The projects are a gateway for millions
of users to access free knowledge and information that they would
never otherwise see. Those repositories shrink as a result of today’s
decision.

Where can I find the full decision?

The full decision can be found at :
http://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/11pdf/10-545.pdf

However, please note that the Supreme Court’s website seems to be
having some problems today and the link above may not be functioning
properly.

Wired.com also has the full decision available at:
http://www.wired.com/images_blogs/threatlevel/2012/01/golanscotusruling.pdf

I don’t want this to happen again! What can I do to fight SOPA and PIPA?

Call your Senators and Representative and tell them you oppose SOPA
and PIPA. If you need help finding out who your Congressional
representatives are, you can simply type in your zip code here.

Alternatively, you can look up who your Senators are here and who your
Representative is here.

_______________________________________________
VereinDE-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/vereinde-l

Antwort per Email an