David,
Wait for 7.6 if you want to implement all features of 5.1
or else
update to 7.5.0.5 with esx 5.0.
The key to understand here is this vmware may come with updates every now and
then however it takes some time for symantec to release compatible binaries for
the same.
In my opinion waiting for 7.6 is better before implementing 5.1 as the VDDK for
5.1 is not stable and has backup issues this has been accepted by VMware.
Anurag
From: da...@stanaway.net
Date: Mon, 10 Jun 2013 16:44:03 -0500
To: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Post upgrade 7.5.0.5 issues?
So what is the verdict on 7.5.0.5?
I am looking to upgrade 7.1.0.3 to 7.5.0.5 W2K8 master, using vstorage API
backups of 5.0 esx, and KMS for managing LTO4 encryption keys, and DDBoost for
data domain OST disk pools.
I want to update esx to 5.1 and allow for SQL 2012 and windows server
2012.___________________________________David Stanaway -
david@stanaway.net___________________________________
On May 20, 2013, at 10:09 AM, Rusty Major <rusty.ma...@sungard.com> wrote:
I would say if you aren't having the issue with NBSL, I would not patch it.
The only damage we see with it is a Java UI that won't load completely and
failures with OpsCenter to connect to the Master. Jobs continue to run and kick
off as expected, we just can't manage them through the UI.
-Rusty
On Sun, May 19, 2013 at 11:27 PM, Lavelle, Michael F
<michael.f.lave...@abbott.com> wrote:
All,
7.5.0.6 has been rescheduled for late June. The new CEO of
Symantec is aware of declining reliability and increases in EEB creation.
We are running three NetBackup 7.5.0.5 domains under RedHat 5
(2.6.18-348) and VCS 5.0. We are running with two EEBs installed:
ET3106719 – the ghost jobs issue which replaces nbjobd
ET3156426 – image catalog filesystem grows dramatically thru failure to
properly clean the old files
This replaces nbpem & bpdbm
We also need to upgrade past VCS 5.0. VCS had been masking the
“largefiles” option of VxFS and the BMR_DATA.db file grep to 2 GB in the primary
UNIX domain. Instance crashed since it could not extend the BMR database.
Recovered OK – thanks to Matthew in Australia. We also have a work around for
the VCS mask of “largefiles”.
We really need 7.5.0.6 for Windows Server 2012 support. This
is really not funny. This proliferation was needed before the end of the year.
That if flunked out of 7.5.0.5 and requires 7.5.0.6 is bad enough. The funny
thing is that the 7.5.0.6 release is now being delayed because the new Symantec
CEO smells the quality of what has been released in recent years (needed
features, but new and unexpected
bugs along with the new code), and is demanding actual engineering
qualification of code releases. Here’s hoping NBU 7.6 is delayed longer and
for the same good reasons.
Rusty,
If you were me, and I already am running with two EEBs, and
have not experienced the NBSL crash and core dump, would you prophylactically
apply
EEB ET3123001 on top of the others? I do not want to run a regression testing
lab for Symantec.
From: veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
[mailto:veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu]
On Behalf Of Rusty Major
Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2013 2:26 PM
To: Kohli, Vidit
Cc: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Post upgrade 7.5.0.5 issues?
Don't wait, there is a fix for the NBSL issues. You might want to call support
to make sure you get the right EEB for your issue as there is more than one.
-Rusty
On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 12:15 PM, Kohli, Vidit <vidit.ko...@blackrock.com>
wrote:
There is major bug in 7.5.0.5 as per Symantec, so better wait for 7.5.0.6
nbsl experiences a memory leak which results in a core dump.
http://www.symantec.com/docs/TECH201979
Product
The following versions of NetBackup are affected by this issue:
NetBackup 7.5.0.5
Summary
The nbsl daemon crashes intermittently and creates a core dump. It was observed
that memory consumed by nbsl was constantly growing, and when it reached
somewhere around 4GB, nbsl
would crash.
This issue is scheduled to be addressed in the following release:
·
NetBackup 7.5 Maintenance Release 6 (7.5.0.6)
From:
veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
[mailto:veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu]
On Behalf Of Justin Piszcz
Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2013 5:13 PM
To: 'Dwayne Adams';
veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Post upgrade 7.5.0.5 issues?
Hi,
Unsure for Windows, for Linux/64-bit and
7.5.0.5:
Yes there is a problem with ghost jobs: (you will see 100s-1000s of jobs Active
but they really complete)
This EEB fixes that issue:
https://www.symantec.com/business/support/index?page=content&id=TECH203521
Justin.
From:
veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
[mailto:veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu]
On Behalf Of Dwayne Adams
Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2013 4:52 PM
To: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Post upgrade 7.5.0.5 issues?
Hello,
I am starting to plan for a 7.5 upgrade from 6.5.6 in an environment that I am
consulting at for the next few months. Has anyone run into any major bugs or
issues with 7.5.0.5
after the upgrade? I am running Windows x64 as my master with multiple NDMP
filers and no media servers.
Thanks,
Dwayne Adams
THIS MESSAGE AND ANY ATTACHMENTS ARE CONFIDENTIAL, PROPRIETARY, AND MAY BE
PRIVILEGED. If this message was misdirected, BlackRock, Inc. and its
subsidiaries, ("BlackRock") does not waive any confidentiality or privilege. If
you are not the intended recipient,
please notify us immediately and destroy the message without disclosing its
contents to anyone. Any distribution, use or copying of this e-mail or the
information it contains by other than an intended recipient is unauthorized.
The views and opinions expressed
in this e-mail message are the author's own and may not reflect the views and
opinions of BlackRock, unless the author is authorized by BlackRock to express
such views or opinions on its behalf. All email sent to or from this address is
subject to electronic
storage and review by BlackRock. Although BlackRock operates anti-virus
programs, it does not accept responsibility for any damage whatsoever caused by
viruses being passed.
_______________________________________________
Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
_______________________________________________
Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
_______________________________________________
Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
_______________________________________________
Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
