By the way, this issue also affects Cornerstone (since it's initial release, and continuing with the current version). The fact that the beta versions of Versions _didn't_ suffer from this was the biggest reason I was using it over Cornerstone.
On Nov 17, 2008, at 12:36 PM, Sofa wrote: > > Hey Daniel, > > Thanks for reporting, we'll look into it soon. > > Kindest regards, > > Koen Bok - madebysofa.com > > On Nov 17, 6:22 pm, Daniel Dickison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> The 1.0 release seems to use a whole lot more memory than beta 9 did. >> I'm guessing it has to do with the "number of modified files for each >> bookmark" indicator. >> >> After I first launch Versions, Activity Monitor shows Versions using >> up 50%-150% of the CPU and "Real Memory" gradually increasing to >> about >> 240 MB over the course of a few minutes. This is a lot more than it >> was using prior to the release (I believe it never exceeded 100 MB or >> so). I'm guessing it's a leak since the memory usage doesn't drop >> after the initial spurt of activity. The big initial CPU usage >> subsides, but will occasionally pick up again even when the app is >> sitting in the background. >> >> I'm stuck with 640 MB of RAM at work so this is a bit painful. Hope >> this can be addressed soon. > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Versions" group. To post to this group, send email to email@example.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/versions?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---