On Thu, May 7, 2009 at 5:58 PM, Alberto Ganesh Barbati < [email protected]> wrote: > > The use of the name "Revert to revision" in Versions is incorrect and very > misleading as the operation only performs an update to a previous revision.
<snip> > This operation should be called "Update to revision" instead, as it is > done in TortoiseSVN, because that's what it does. > I agree. This post, and the many others on this list like it are proof enough that "Revert to revision" is misleading, and ends up making Versions look broken, when really it is just a poor choice of a name. I assume merge support is being worked on -- until then, I hope they change this, if only to clarify what it does for newcomers. -Ray --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Versions" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/versions?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
