I would like to support this. The naming is confusing, especially for beginners.
Kind regards, - Marijn On May 8, 2009, at 2:29 AM, Ray wrote: > On Thu, May 7, 2009 at 5:58 PM, Alberto Ganesh Barbati > <[email protected] > > wrote: > The use of the name "Revert to revision" in Versions is incorrect > and very misleading as the operation only performs an update to a > previous revision. > <snip> > This operation should be called "Update to revision" instead, as it > is done in TortoiseSVN, because that's what it does. > > I agree. This post, and the many others on this list like it are > proof enough that "Revert to revision" is misleading, and ends up > making Versions look broken, when really it is just a poor choice of > a name. I assume merge support is being worked on -- until then, I > hope they change this, if only to clarify what it does for newcomers. > > -Ray > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Versions" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/versions?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
