Koen, This is exactly the type of communication I was hoping for. I'm now looking forward to this upcoming version on an unpredictable timeline :)
On Aug 8, 5:53 am, Koen Bok <k...@madebysofa.com> wrote: > Hey Quinn, Shan and Ray, > > For what it's worth, I can officially confirm we're working on it. > It's a tough one, but we feel we're on the right way to tackle it. > Regarding the timeframe I can't promise anything. I can however give > some hints on why this is taking some time. > > - Subversions 1.6 merging became a lot better, so we had to wait for > that. It was actually pretty tough to do 1.5>1.6 but we have it now. > - Subversions merging options are so complex that we need to make > choices to keep the ui usable, involving lots of discussions and > research. > - Merging as a problem is more then subversion alone. You also have to > deal with content/conflicts in a sensible way if you want to do it > right. > > And Quinn, if your job gets less dreamy, shoot me an email ;-) > > - Koen > > On Aug 7, 7:08 pm, Shan <iotas...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > Quinn, > > > No offense taken. At first, I shared your opinion, but unfortunately > > given the utter silence from the Versions team, and lack of responses > > to any methods of communication other than this group, they really > > left me with no other options. I've waited patiently since the beta > > for any sort of hint that they'll be adding merge, yet week after week > > someone asks for merge to be a feature, with no feedback from the > > team. I don't feel that I'm more important than anyone else, but I'd > > rather let them know they're about to lose a customer now, rather than > > they just don't see me upgrade to 2.0 because I'm already gone. > > > It's nice that you happen to know that 1.1 and 2.0 are being worked > > on, but all I can do IS imagine, because of the lack of communication > > from the Versions team. From what I've read on the group, they barely > > respond to sales requests, and almost never to support requests, until > > you come to this group and raise a ruckus. > > > I'm not saying that the the feature needs to be done tomorrow, or even > > a timeline on when it might be done, I'm just asking that the team > > acknowledge a year's worth of complaints of users who need the > > functionality, and give us some hope that they're actually planning on > > doing something about it. > > > Shan --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Versions" group. To post to this group, send email to versions@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to versions+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/versions?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
