I'd love to see Versions updated too. Merging is the thing I'm waiting for.
In the meantime I've been using SmartSVN. It's a java based app and so a bit clunky but it works well once you get used to it and so I'm hardly using Versions now. Paul On 2 Sep 2010, at 17:11, Brian Gibson wrote: > I too am hitting the limits of Versions' capabilities. Since > competition is a good thing, what are some other source control GUIs > that can supplement or replace Versions? > > On Aug 15, 5:18 pm, TheDO <[email protected]> wrote: >> (I tried to reply to an existing thread here regarding this to keep >> that discussion alive, but it doesn't seem to be working, so I started >> a new thread) >> >> Versions is a great application and continues to work well for me, but >> despite promises by Sofa to add more development resources to the >> project, updates between releases continues to be very unpredictable. >> They've said for a year that they are working on some usability >> improvements, but these haven't come yet. It's been nearly 5 months >> since the last update and there's been 2 Subversion updates since >> then. >> >> I'm not complaining, I'm just sharing an observation that is >> unsettling with a product that had such promise. I guess we can blame >> the changing landscape and the mass adoption of other version control >> tools. Maybe Versions needed to be designed to utilize more than one >> version control system, rather than limiting itself to Subversion? >> >> I feel it's important to communicate about products that we are >> passionate about. I wholeheartedly hope that Versions gets the love it >> needs from its developers. Three cheers for Sofa and company. You can >> do it. >> >> /TheDO/ > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Versions" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/versions?hl=en.
