I agree. Cornerstone's merge methodology works well in at least the basic way. I haven't yet had the unfortunate experience of having to merge heavy conflicts so I cannot speculate to that extent. But it does the job, and if Versions incorporated such a feature I may just hang on to it
Cue On 17 Nov 2010, at 20:28, Rob Rye <rowen...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Nov 13, 2010, at 2:24 AM, Chris Muktar wrote: > >> No GUI app supports >> this very well, but it would be the killer feature of Versions if it >> did- even cornerstone doesn't have that. As teams grow, using merge >> becomes ESSENTIAL and there needs to be a GUI for doing it (even if >> it's just basic merge operations) as doing it on the command line is >> hairy. >> > > What is wrong with Cornerstone's support of merge? It seems to be quite > effective to me. > > Rob > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Versions" group. > To post to this group, send email to versi...@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > versions+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/versions?hl=en. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Versions" group. To post to this group, send email to versi...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to versions+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/versions?hl=en.
