I agree -- it was useful to see that Cornerstone had gotten a merge feature. Competition is good and I hope it pressures Sofa to up the ante.
On the other hand, I tried the new Cornerstone and fortunately (for Sofa), I'll be sticking with Versions for now. We have repositories with hundreds of thousands of files and revisions, and Cornerstone's fancy timeline view doesn't seem to scale very well for large histories. Things like viewing the log message and diffs for a specific revision from 2 years ago is a lot easier to navigate with Versions. And to do that Versions was using 400MB RAM vs 1.5GB for Cornerstone. So, hopefully performance is one aspect Versions can stay on top while adding new features. Daniel On Jan 3, 3:42 pm, ct-scan <[email protected]> wrote: > I'm glad the link to Cornerstone was posted, I've been using Versions > since the beta, and am getting frustrated that this obvious feature > still isn't integrated. > > Maybe instead of additional UI enhancements (like the ones that just > came out), adding this much requested feature would be better. > I'd even upgrade to a new version for this feature, with no > hesitation. I love Versions, but it's just not the most complete tool > out there. > I hope they fix this. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Versions" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/versions?hl=en.
