True Bob!  Not forgetting those!  I just know it's tougher to chase the
tricos and caddis, and I know that some across the pond don't consider
the hoppers, beetles, and ants to be "true" dry fly fishing!

Ed Roden
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.questquality.com

Living would be easier if men showed as much patience at
home as they do when they're fishing.

> 
> ED, Edd, & Eddy,
>       How soon we forget in our old age!  What about the great Trico &
> Whitefly hatches.  Our caddis and beloved BWW.  If that isn't 
> enough we
> have hoppers, battles ants ECT.  How about those vegetarian trout the
> berry & twig eaters.  Ed is right April thru July are the best.  Good
> dry fly action can be had as early as March.
> 
> BobH AKA The Mad Midgemister!
> 
> 
> I think you need to consider Michigan!  Best dry fly would be
> April-June.  Mid-June - end of June in Michigan is hex season 
> - BIG dry
> flies in the dark!  There are several VFBers who would be glad to host
> you and show you the ropes! 
> 
> Ed Roden
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://www.questquality.com
> 
> Living would be easier if men showed as much patience at
> home as they do when they're fishing.
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chris Cook
> > Sent: Monday, December 08, 2003 3:34 PM
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: Re: [VFB] Some questions on the US
> > 
> > 
> > Thanks Wes,
> > the more replies that I get, the more replies that suggest 
> > that it is a
> > crazy idea and that a smaller trip would be a lot more beneficial.
> > I have fished in Yellowstone before and really liked it. I 
> > was a little
> > disappointed at the amount of dry fly fishing that we did - 
> > the guide we had
> > said we would pick up more fish by using big streamers and a 
> > small nymph
> > tailing it.
> > Perhaps a more concerted effort on a couple of states would 
> be better.
> > 
> > Chris
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > >
> > > Chris Cook asked:
> > >
> > > > If you were to zig zag across America i.e. from bottom 
> > right to bottom
> > > > left, up a state, back across to the right, up a state, 
> > back across to
> > > > the
> > > > left until you have been through all the states, how many 
> > thousands of
> > > > miles
> > > > are you looking at?
> > >
> > > Miami, Florida to Seattle, Washington -  3394 road miles
> > > Seattle, Washington to San Diego, California - 1255 miles
> > > San Diego, California  to Bangor, Maine - 3270 miles
> > > Bangor, Maine to Miami Florida - 1737 miles
> > > and that does not include anywhere near all the states!
> > >
> > > Miami (SE)
> > > Seattle (NW)
> > > San Diego (SW)
> > > Bangor (NE)
> > >
> > >
> > > Hi Chris,
> > >
> > > Linda and I have had the pleasure of making several trips 
> to the UK,
> > > and can relate to the European curiosity about the vast 
> distances in
> > > the US.
> > >
> > > For example, we were surprised to find in comparison that 
> > the country
> > > of Wales, UK, is about 60 miles wide and 160 miles high.  
> > And that the
> > > entire United Kingdom would fit inside the U.S. state of Oregon.
> > >
> > > Distances in the U.S., in comparison, are downright scary to
> > > contemplate driving.
> > >
> > > If you indeed are thinking about a long auto trip in the 
> States, you
> > > would be best picking a section of the country and spending 
> > more time
> > > in depth exploring and enjoying and less driving.  Doing 
> the Pacific
> > > Northwest and California (starting in April in California 
> > and ending in
> > > October in the state of Washington and B.C. Canada) would be an
> > > incredible trip, with a full range of fishing from bass to
> > > ocean-species, to trout, steelhead and salmon, not to mention the
> > > mind-boggling assortment of sightseeing, terrain and 
> > history you could
> > > experience.
> > >
> > > Just a thought.  Other areas of the U.S. would hold their 
> > own selection
> > > of enjoyment. Hope the above mileage figures answer your question.
> > >
> > > Wes Wada
> > > Bend, Oregon
> > >
> > >
> > 
> > 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 


Reply via email to