Pete: I had already ordered the kit with the Master Vise in it, but when I
upgrade to a rotary (and I DO plan too ASAP).. I will give this one a look,
I bookmarked it, cause for the money, it looks like a great vise.... Thanks
for the info....
Chuck who IS wondering if swapping the jaws a lot would be a hassle, but
just tying bluegill flies, I should use the same one 99% of the time..

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Pete and Michelle Lawrence" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, July 01, 2005 2:13 AM
Subject: RE: [VFB] Cabelas Vise ????


>
> Chuck,
>
> You may want to give the Danvise a look see.  I tye mostly warmwater flies
> and have used a Danvise for the last 7 years with no problem.  Over that
> time I have tyed quite a few bassbugs on it.  It is nice that you do not
> need different jaws for different size hooks.
>
> Tight lines,
>
> Pete
> Please check out our site for for warmwater flies and fine bamboo and
> graphite rods.  All items made with my own hands.
>
> http://blacklabfliesandsupplies.com
>
> <br><br><br>From: &quot;Chuck Alexander&quot;
> &lt;[EMAIL PROTECTED]&gt;<br>Reply-To:
> &lt;[email protected]&gt;<br>To: &lt;[email protected]&gt;<br>Subject: [VFB]
> Cabelas Vise ????<br>Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2005 20:16:01 -0500<br><br>Can
> anybody tell me the difference between the Cabela's &quot;AA Vise&quot;
and
> their &quot;Master Vise&quot;?? &quot;Master Vise&quot; according to the
> site and catalog.. is higher in price cause it has three sets of
> &quot;jaws&quot; vs the one set in the &quot;AA Vise&quot;.. Do these jaws
> really give me a wider range of Hook sizes??? or will it just mean more
that
> can &quot;break down&quot;??? Only thing I need to tye are bream
(bluegill),
> bass, and crappie flies, so will the AA meet my needs or should I get the
> &quot;Master&quot; with the three sets of Jaws???? Thanks in advance...I
> tell ya, I'm gonna order a &quot;kit&quot; tomorrow, one way or another,
but
> with a VERY SLIM wallet LOL.. Trying to decide is harder that I imagined
> LOL.... Chuck<br>
>
>

Reply via email to