In Alabama, it is illegal to fillet a fish on the rivers,until you get home,
because we have size limits, and "slot limits" on largemouth bass (you must
let largemouth between 13-16 inches go).The marine biologist keep a close
eye on the bass population, and if it is getting too big, they will remove
the slot limit for a few months, or a season, to get the largemouth bass
back to where the populations need to be. They say that law is mostly
because Weiss lake(the backwater of the Coosa River) here is considered the
"Crappie Capitol of the World" by many, and the Crappie must be 9 inches
long in most rivers, and 10 inches from Lake Weiss, and the game wardens
cannot measure the length of a fish from a fillet. Also, you better not have
more than the creel limit of any species on you PERIOD.. If you are gonna
keep the biggest fish, then you must immediately release one (Live) smaller
fish right then, or they will give you a HUGE ticket(s).... I like those
laws, cause it really does cut down on poaching etc, and gives us all a
healthy, prospering fish population here, Chuck

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Larry Johnson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, February 09, 2006 12:36 PM
Subject: RE: [VFB] Environmentalist/Conservation - FR&R


This expression probably refers to the practice of dropping EVERYTHING you
catch into the live well.  When you get to shore, you fillet the fish you
intend to keep, and throw the rest (too small, etc.) back into the water,
whether or not  they are still alive, and whether or not they will survive
after the way they have been treated (including the trauma of being caught).
I have seen this done.  This is a lot more damaging to fish populations than
keeping one or two for dinner.  It's outrageous.

Larry J

>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2/9/2006 9:06 AM >>>
I was a little curious about what a filet and release is also.  I thought it
was just dumping the waste until I saw Paul Marriners post about filleting
and releasing them live????
How's that possible?  I'm not sure I really want to know but you know what
they say about curious minds*.
Regards,
Deb

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Ed Roden
Sent: Thursday, February 09, 2006 9:25 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [VFB] Environmentalist/Conservation - FR&R

That issue is still on the night-stand - I'll try and read Ted's rant later
today and comment.....if you aren't familiar with Ted Williams, he is an
EXTREMELY thought-provoking writer who will usually rub you the wrong way
for something.  Almost every issue has a letter of somebody complaining
they're canceling their subscription because of him, but I have found him to
be very thorough in most of his research, even if I don't agree with all of
his conclusions.

I would encourage you to do a google search on "michigan coaster brook
trout" to find out more.  They are endangered, though in the UP more from
sulfide mining than from "fillet-and-release" crowds.

I'll add more later....
On 2/8/06, Kevin W. Machon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

On the environmentalist topic, has anyone found Ted Williams article in the
newest FR&R, "Bringing Back The Giants", about great lakes "coaster"
brookies mildly disturbing?

I'm fine with fishing magazines calling for removing dams and new
legislation and even picinkg out any political party for doing whatever
they're doing.  But this article seems to cross some line.  A couple
passages (and I'll try to not otally remove them from context):

"Although Wisconsin and Michigan still allow the mass slaughter of potential
coasters in most of their tributaries," and "In 1989, despite an ugly
confrontation with the fillet-and-release crowd-".  C'mon!  Slaughter?
Fillet-and-release?  What does that even mean?  Keep some and release some?

I know folks on the list here keep sone fish they catch for the freezer
(gasp!) - bass, trout, panfish, whatever - and I have some in my freezer -
bass, trout, panfish and whatever - although I release 95% of what I catch
as I'm sure most of you all do, too.  I don't need to feel guilty about
eating what I catch, and I don't think anyoe who legally catches and keeps
fish.  This article seems like over the top browbeating.

Has anyone else senn this and have any reaction?  Or am I totally
overreacting?

Sorry - had to vent.

Kev
Proud Member, Fillet-and-Release Club (whatever that means)




-- 
Ed Roden
flyfished at gmail dot com
     - OR -
flyfished at questquality dot com



Reply via email to