I was looking at the Pentax Optio and the Olumpus 725SW. Both pocket size,
both waterproof. Olympus was also "shockproof". I ended up going for the
Olympus, reviews seemed to be about the same for both. Finding the Olympus
at Costco was a deciding factor. :)

I've been happy with it so far, pictures turn out nice, definitely performs
just fine taking pictures underwater. I miss the normal eye viewer but the
LCD screen has been worked so that it's visible in sunlight. I can see
what's on the screen in bright sun with polarized sunglasses.

I bought it specifically for fishing since I mostly wade or fish out of a
kayak. It's also good for the pool & waterparks with the kids. Fits in my
pocket, durable and waterproof, takes a decent picture - works for me. I'm
sure the pentax provides a similar experience.

ken

On 6/24/07, Rene Zillmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

Allan Fish wrote:

>> Hey Rene,
>> Try looking at the Pentax Optio,
>
>
> Be sure it's the Pentax Optio WP. The WP stands for "Waterproof".
>
> The plain Pentax Optio is $100 less, but is not waterproof.
>
> It gets good pictures, but I don't like composing the picture on the
> screen. I prefer one that has an
> eye-level view finder. That's just my own personal opinion. But
> you've got to remember I'm an old dog and can't learn new tricks.
> (SHADDUP CHUCK & JESTER & DONO & JIMMY &........oh well.......you all
> don't have to rub it in!!)
>
> The Pentax Optio does NOT have the capabilities of the Fuji 5700. It
> has the advantage of being much smaller and fits nicely into a pocket
> of your fishing vest. I have one and always take it when I'm in a
> fishing situation. For all other pictures, I use a 'bigger' camera.
>
>
> Allan



Reply via email to