Alissa Cooper wrote:
As the liaison statement notes, there are many concurrent ongoing efforts to develop video codecs, and the NETVC work would merely be one additional such effort. We do not view the proposed NETVC work as harmful for interoperability, but rather as helpful, considering the fact that at present the licensing environment creates barriers to full interoperability in many cases.
I think the important point is that there are *no* existing standardization efforts with the simultaneous goals of best-in-class performance *and* royalty-free licensing (however we choose to phrase that).
_______________________________________________ video-codec mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/video-codec
