Dear Andrew, dear Greg, Thank you so much for your comments and recommendations!
I agree with you that these frame-rates (presented in Table 2 in BT.2020-2) should be included into Table 1 of draft-ietf-netvc-requirements. However, I'd like to emphasize that all the tables presented in section 2 of draft-ietf-netvc-requirements provide just the most frequent use-cases and do not cover every use-case. So, I agree with James that variable frame-rate should be supported. Another question to be discussed is where it should be supported (in the NETVC codec or in a container). Evidently, Andrew is absolutely right that the highest frame-rate should be limited in Table 6. In my opinion, the maximum frame-rate should depend on resolution to meet the complexity requirement. -- Best regards, Alexey Filippov
_______________________________________________ video-codec mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/video-codec
