yeah I view my work as art.
I view videoblogging as a separate channel, from traditional movie making and television, to get my work out distributed.
Much of my content would never find an outlet in those areas.
I spend a lot of time going beyond just turning on the camera and talking (not that such things can't be art).
Editing, planning, writing, etc.
Sometimes lots of that, sometimes little.
Look around www.human-dog.com, there are many styles involved in the various approaches.
There are many approaches contained within the lab videos:
http://www.human-dog.com/lab
I think of video in a videoblog structure as equal to anything I might find in a gallery or theatre or on TV as far legitimacy.
Chris Weagel
www.human-dog.com
On Jul 20, 2005, at 9:38 PM, pomoartchick wrote:
Hi All,
I am interested in the unique qualities of vlogs that set them apart
from or add to the dialogue of video. Do you see a difference between
vlogs and other video productions? How would you describe those
differences? Is it in the vlogs themselves, the mode of
production/distribution, or is it a bit of both? If a televison show
is offered exclusively online, is it a vlog?
I'm curious as to how many here view their vlogs as art. Do you
consider what you do art? would you be interested in showing your
vlogs in an art context?
I'm not much for tech talk but I do love to talk about the theoretical
implications of vlogging. Any thoughts?
Anne
http://8bitme.blogspot.com
http://nopractice.blogspot.com
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
▪ Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web.
▪ To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
▪ Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
