am still learning how to do this. But I have some ideas down the road
that are much more in the art catagory. Come to think of it I don't
like catagories - I like the freedom to do what I want.
Years ago i was involved in public access tv and when I tried to step
over the "line", well, you know...
What is different about vblogging is that you don't have a bunch of
input from other people into what it is that you want(or should)do. It
is much more "your vision". This is not to diss other ways of
producing video. But I think video blogging allows for a more
intensive contact with the viewer.
I am surprised more artists are not doing this - I think it is because
they don't know or understand the accessibility of medium just yet.
Oh well, each one - teach one
Gena
http://outonthestoop.blogspot.com
--- In [email protected], "pomoartchick" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I am interested in the unique qualities of vlogs that set them apart
> from or add to the dialogue of video. Do you see a difference
between
> vlogs and other video productions? How would you describe those
> differences? Is it in the vlogs themselves, the mode of
> production/distribution, or is it a bit of both? If a televison show
> is offered exclusively online, is it a vlog?
>
> I'm curious as to how many here view their vlogs as art. Do you
> consider what you do art? would you be interested in showing your
> vlogs in an art context?
>
> I'm not much for tech talk but I do love to talk about the
theoretical
> implications of vlogging. Any thoughts?
>
> Anne
> http://8bitme.blogspot.com
> http://nopractice.blogspot.com
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
- Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web.
- To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
