Isn't there a way to be less *precise* in geotagging? Especially since maps can take
coordinates and map an address.

ER



--- In [email protected], "LeanBackVids.com" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> We can already start automating the process of geotagging by including
> the latitude and longitude in our XML feeds.  The W3C recommends the
> following format...
>
> <geo:lat>47.612</geo:lat>
> <geo:long>-122.328</geo:long>
>
> Ideally, both the feed and indivual posts will include geotags.  This
> allows us to not only map the feed provider, but also each item of
> content.
>
> FeedBurner recently added support for geotagging your feeds.  Just
> signin and edit your feed, then scroll down to the "Geotag Your Feed"
> option.
>
> I am fully aware of how "not-easy" it is to find the lat/lon of a
> location, but until our cameras include GPS it will remain an added
> process.  To make things slightly easier, I built this location finder
> page...
> http://www.vlogmap.org/finder.php
>
> Note, it also includes the new del.icio.us tagging which allows us to
> map specific videos.  Yes, this is not an automated or easy process,
> but we will all continue to benefit from the adoption of geotagging.
>
> -Matt
> --------------------------------------
> http://www.leanbackvids.com/videoblog/
>
>
> --- In [email protected], "Jan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Heheh - soon there are those who will automate the process of
> listing you on the vlogmap - rumour - innuendo - however, until then,
> you must list yourself.
> >
> > Jan
> > .
> >   ----- Original Message -----
> >   From: Allen Weiner
> >   Subject: Re: [videoblogging] Videobloggers in Arizona?
> >
> >   Can't be too accurate. It doesn't show me.





YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS




Reply via email to