around the 7/9/05 Enric mentioned about [videoblogging] Re: Gov't always wins the election that: >Does KKK stand for something different in Australia than in the U.S.A.?
no. and i'm *not* a member of the KKK, I was being facetious to try to demonstrate my point. Since I'm not North American I apologise to everyone on the list if it came across as poor or bad taste. > > >>can anyone explain to me how >> this is *better* journalism than that practiced by someone at least >> trained in some professional practice, a code of ethics, who (even >> though it is dumb) at least thinks stories have 'two' sides? > >I thought objectivity was the significant factor in professional >journalism (getting mulitple sources, corraboration, etc.) yep, which is as problematic as any other value, but this is my point (and I think Andreas makes a similar point). A videoblogger representing racist views - how on earth is that more pure citizen journalism or more pure journalism than someone who at least uses the benchmark of objectivity (which we can at least meaure against). -- cheers Adrian Miles hypertext.RMIT <URL:http://hypertext.rmit.edu.au/vlog> ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> Fair play? Video games influencing politics. Click and talk back! http://us.click.yahoo.com/T8sf5C/tzNLAA/TtwFAA/lBLqlB/TM --------------------------------------------------------------------~-> Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
