|
Everyone's an expert. We have some cool stuff coming up, have some patience. This stuff doesn't get developed overnight. We know you want a web version now, so just chill and I'm sure you'll hear about it if/when we have one :).
Clint On Oct 7, 2005, at 9:01 PM, aroundtheperimeter wrote: it seems to me as soon as google does a video aggregator. there will
be no need for fireant. sure they will be some die-hard fireant fans,
but the masses will go to google if it easier to use and better. i
would like to see fireant stay the leader in video aggregator's and
not become obsolete.
Also to convince my friends to watch video it would be easier to tell
them to go to this link "www.example.c" then to tell them to download
fireant. Just seems like people want instant gratification (you say
whats a 2 minute download...on the Internet that's a long time as you
know). If there was two products with equal quality out there and one
was web based and other a download, I think the web based one would
spread faster. Just because google reader is not that good it will
be. It is in beta..
as for patients..hey i will wait years if needed for you guys to put
up a web based aggregator... but will google and yahoo?
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Joshua Kinberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> Hey, I have no problems with web-based readers. To each their own.
> I simply do not find them very useful or efficient for watching video
> or doing the things that I want to do with video.
>
> Honestly, I hope this Google Reader gets better soon. Its very hard
to use.
>
> If you want a web-based video aggregator, check our
> http://MeFeedia.com developed by Peter Van Dijk, one of the other
> co-founders of this group. It is hands-down the best web-based video
> aggregator out there. Easy to use and has great features. Plus Peter
> is a cool guy :-)
>
> This doesn't mean that FireAnt is not thinking about web-based
> services -- we definitely have some stuff cooking... its just not
> quite ready to show. Give it some time.... be patient.
>
> -josh
>
>
>
> On 10/7/05, aroundtheperimeter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > THIS IS WHAT I'M talking about! Can you make a web based fireant. I
> > know you would still have to stream it (which I have no problem with).
> > Look I know I'm ignorant on all the tech stuff, but this is what I
> > meant by web based fireant! Check out this google link:
> >
> > http://www.google.com/reader/things/intro\\
> > The fireant would be video instead of video
> >
> > I just think that a web based site would be more user friendly. As
> > soon as google went to web based video and got rid of the google
> > viewer it became very easy to use. Listen I come here to learn and
> > I'm just putting ideas out there. I love what you guys are doing!
> > Have a great day.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Yahoo! Groups Links
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
SPONSORED LINKS
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
|
- Re: [videoblogging] Re: Pete Prodoehl and Josh Kenberg Clint Sharp
-
