I think the source of frustration is that historical posts (on both
sides of the fence) seem to justify their choice of audience by
implying it is somehow superior to others.  That's not really the case
... they are just different options.

The frustration comes when posts imply that a vlog is either boring
and not palatable to the masses (as if appealing to the masses is a
required aspect to any worthy vlog), or that it's just the
same-old-same-old corporate-esk mass media content put up on the web
... That the creators of vlogs are either mundane folks who just don't
get the potential of the medium they are using, or they are
opportunistic corporate-like entities not at all interested in the
intimacy vlogging can provide.   Both are extremes and not reality ...
but both have been implied on both sides of the content debate (and
just because someone cant find a word-for-word statement of something
doesn't mean it cant be or hasn't been implied).

Of course vloggers understand the medium.  We needn't confuse the fact
that they aren't of earth shacking importance or bound to be wildly
popular as 'not getting it' ... that's a choice they've made. They're
ok with knowing that at best 5 people are going to chuckle as they
film themselves brushing their teeth.  They get it.  They get it just
fine.  They don't need to be popular, or have a point, or care about
either to be exactly on target.

On the flip side of the coin ... Rocketboom is great.  No it doesn't
foster the intimacy required to make brushing your teeth interesting
... but that doesn't make it any less valuable. Yes it can be
'entertaining' to a far wider group of people than a personal-journal
vlog ... but that doesn't make it any more valuable.

RB is designed to reach a very wide audience.  It uses a proven format
that many people can immediately warm up to and enjoy.  And the fact
that this is exactly what has  happened does not make it evil, and it
does not make it a more valid format of vlog ... it's simply the
result of a more themed based vlog.

I'm not sure what backlash you are getting Andrew, but I think Verdi
is taking exception to statements not format / content.

"Its not really the world's fault that more people respond to content
that is intended to be
entertaining."

Just try to remember that the above quote is mis-leading.  the
corrected version is:

"Its not really the world's fault that more people respond to content
that is intended to be
entertaining *to the masses*."

Some vlogs are only aiming to be 'entertaining' to
friends/family/random-like-minded-people.  Your original quote implies
that personal vlogs are something they are not ... or rather are not
something that they are.

They are in fact meant to be entertainig ... to a very select group. 
The are responded to - quite well often  ... by a small and intimate
group of people.

- Dave
--
http://www.DavidMeade.com


------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> 
Get fast access to your favorite Yahoo! Groups. Make Yahoo! your home page
http://us.click.yahoo.com/dpRU5A/wUILAA/yQLSAA/lBLqlB/TM
--------------------------------------------------------------------~-> 

 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 


Reply via email to