|
you must mean the "copyrighter" - the author often has little say in
matters once a piece is published Brad Webb wrote: The secondary part, not sure about.. the non-profit side of things. However, the payment to the writer -- the only thing required to distribute a cover -- is correct. Obviously, a deal/agreement has to be made with any performer.Ronen wrote:Am I incorrect that a 'cover' version of a song requires that a deal must be arranged with the performer, but that a fixed percentage exists to be paid to the writer? And that if we're dealing with non-profit distribution, the only issue is arranging a deal with the performer who performed the cover? On 11/21/05, *Pete Prodoehl* <[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote: Steve Garfield wrote: -- My name is Markus Sandy and I am app.etitio.us http://apperceptions.org http://digitaldojo.blogspot.com http://spinflow.org http://wearethemedia.com http://www.corante.com/events/feedfest/ aim/ichat: [EMAIL PROTECTED] msn: [EMAIL PROTECTED] skype: msandy spin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
|
- Re: [videoblogging] Re: mainstream music in vi... Markus Sandy
- Re: [videoblogging] Re: mainstream music ... Ronen
- [videoblogging] Re: mainstream music ... Darren Winkler Darren Scott
