|
"It's just not good net-etiquette to copy and paste entire
articles. The article is not yours to publish."
I'm not great on etiquette. I subscribe to the New York Times.
Anyone can access articles from the last five days for free. If I am
creating a discussion thread at The Immortality Institute referring to some
scientific article or news story from the NYT, most people won't bother to click
a link, sign up and read it.
If the discussion thread continues for over five
days (most do), then it is impossible for others to get the article without
paying for it unless they are NYT subscribers.
Since The Immortality Institute is a 501 (c)
nonprofit corporation, we act as a kind of repository for information. As
an Immortalist, it is more important to me to share valuable and important
information with others devoted to stopping the disease of aging than it is to
"respect" the NYT "technical" copyright.
I don't know exactly what the law is.
However, if the NYT wants to pay a lawyer to go after me for sharing knowledge
with others, (1) they would be giving themselves a black eye from the bad
publicity and (2) they would be acting in a financially stupid fashion since
such article sharing doesn't really harm them.
I'm reminded of the case in which a guy was
convicted of murder after the New Jersey Turnpike revealed his car had passed
through an "automatic pass" device right before and after the murder of his
estranged girlfriend. The court ruled that they could use that evidence
because a police officer could have sat there and recorded the license plate of
every passing car.
Well, I buy a copy of the New York Times. I
could cut out the article and show it to as many of my friends as I
wished. Is it so different for me to share it "for free" with my more
numerous friends around the world on the Internet?
Randolfe (Randy) Wicker
Videographer, Writer, Activist
Advisor: The Immortality Institute Hoboken, NJ http://www.randywickerreporting.blogspot.com/ 201-656-3280
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
|
- Re: [videoblogging] Re: GUBA Randolfe Wicker
- Re: [videoblogging] New York Times Link Generator (wa... Steve Garfield
- Re: [videoblogging] Re: GUBA Pete Prodoehl
- Re: [videoblogging] Re: GUBA Joan Khoo
