around the 23/11/05 Enric mentioned about [videoblogging] Re: War On Text that: >I don't see the relationship. Cinema and the subset of the edit is >linear, hypertext is non-linear. This seems more poetic simile >mismatch than illuminating.
quickly (am busy) A. shot of man, cut to shot of dead child. man interpreted to be expressing grief B. shot of man (identical), beautiful woman man interpreted expressing desire/love etc. exactly same content, new relation, new meaning. the meaning is NOT in the shot, if it were then how could A and B be possible? (if meaning in the shot then what they mean would be indpendent of order or relations between parts). same deal with hypertext links, which all hypertext fiction has demonstrated. you're right, difference is hypertext has multiple possibilities, trad. film (not vogging) has one. but that is only difference. effect of link/edit is same. -- cheers Adrian Miles this email is bloggable [ ] ask first [ ] private [x] hypertext.RMIT <URL:http://hypertext.rmit.edu.au/admin/briefEmail.html > ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> Get fast access to your favorite Yahoo! Groups. Make Yahoo! your home page http://us.click.yahoo.com/dpRU5A/wUILAA/yQLSAA/lBLqlB/TM --------------------------------------------------------------------~-> Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
