we should have an authority to rate a vlog. just like netiba On 12/2/05, Deirdre Straughan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On 12/2/05, Frank Carver <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I don't think it would work leaving the categorizing to the submitter. > > I can imagine plenty of reasons why someone might (deliberately or > > accidentally) mis-categorize something. > > Yes, of course, but... I don't think that any of the sites which purport to > review everything before allowing it to be posted have set themselves a > reasonable task. As video on the Internet explodes exponentially, no single > group or company (except maybe Google) can afford the human resources to > review that much footage. > > I'm assuming that the rest of your post advocates "reactive" tagging, where > something would be reviewed only if flagged as nasty by someone. Which does > seem the only sensible approach, as long as you don't get mischief-makers > randomly tagging everything as rotten just to keep you busy. > > best regards, > Deirdré Straughan > > www.beginningwithi.com (personal) > www.tvblob.com (work) > > ________________________________ > YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS > > > > Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web. > > To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service. > > ________________________________ >
-- http://duller.blogspot.com ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> Most low income households are not online. Help bridge the digital divide today! http://us.click.yahoo.com/I258zB/QnQLAA/TtwFAA/lBLqlB/TM --------------------------------------------------------------------~-> Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
