--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, "Kent Nichols" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, "Enric" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Media RSS has not been widely adopted outside of Yahoo. Look at some > > of the prior posts on here about multiple enclosures. > > That's like saying Microsoft Word has not been widely adopted outside > of Microsoft. Are there competitors? Sure. Can it be easier for > people to find and subscribe to feeds, absolutely, but right now > FireAnt and iTunes use mRSS. Done and done. >
Joshua Kinberg could probably address the usage of media RSS bettter. My impression is that most people don't post in multiple enclosures. > > > > "Video podcasting" does not apply to products like fireAnt that allow > > the blog and feedback that makes a videoblog. > > You're right I did not address the interactive potential of video > blogging. But Video Blogging is still a push media much like > television. Actualy RSS and therefore videoblogs are in a pull mechanism. The aggregators have to poll the sites for pulling updates, they're not notified and pushed content. > Part of the attraction to video blogs is the > responsiveness from the creators of the shows to the audience. Emails > and comments can be incorporated into the next show. Try emailing > your favorite show now and see what happens. > > > > > Once you find a podcast you like, you can tell these programs > > > to always download the newest content when it appears on the net. > > > > > > > Again, this is only the distribution aspect, not the interaction and > > response capabilities in blogs. > > > > Here and following is shown how to fit into the current model of one > > way television communication, rather than the disruptive change of > > incorporating the ability of linking and comment response in blogging. > > The one-way non-interactive large audience broadcast model hasn't > > evolved, just opened up to more people with less resources. > > Yes, exactly. This opens up creation to practically everyone. I > still think we're in the middle of evolving the model of how > interactive the media can be, but I've seen studies and heard > anecdotes that people want to be engaged and told a story -- the > dislike too many options or adventures to choose from during an actual > story. I think that's absolutely correct. And after they've finished seeing the show they're very motivated to respond: "That's great, I really love the...", "That sucks the way you showed that guy...", etc. > > But the interaction after the fact -- emails, comments, etc. -- that > is where the video podcasts are alive. Yup! The more immediately after, the better. Sometimes people are into it during. Like, "Hey, why did you bring that character into the story?" (which they may forget by the time it's over.) > > -Kent > -- Enric ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> Most low income households are not online. Help bridge the digital divide today! http://us.click.yahoo.com/I258zB/QnQLAA/TtwFAA/lBLqlB/TM --------------------------------------------------------------------~-> Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
