--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, "Matthew Clayfield" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, "Enric" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Well, there's a definition of cinema, I would say too loosely defined. > > But a start. I'm not proposing a restrictive defintion of > > videoblogging. Just that it is more useful to have a workable > > definition than none. > > > > -- Enric > > Oh, come off it. The moment you add anything to that description > you're essentially disregarding whole groups of very cinematic films. > Do you know anything about scientific names? Well, cinema is a phylum, > not a species. >
RSS, OPML, HTTP are imperfect standards. But they're quite useful. A model not need to be general to the point that it must fit every possibility present and to the future. Some models are more useful when defining the general qualities of a subject and leaving out the outliers. It's not a crime to have models (or to skateboard.) -- Enric ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> Get Bzzzy! (real tools to help you find a job). Welcome to the Sweet Life. http://us.click.yahoo.com/KIlPFB/vlQLAA/TtwFAA/lBLqlB/TM --------------------------------------------------------------------~-> Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
