Although I'm generally anti-"vlog definition fight" -- I gotta say Josh K and Steve G are right on the money.
Debating what kinds of content, etc. are a videoblog is one thing. But just slapping video on a static web site is most certainly NOT a videoblog. By that reasoning, almost every web page would be a blog because it has text. You at least need dated entries of some sort to be a blog format. That's what it *is*. Dated entries in reverse chronological order. Comments and RSS feeds are nice, but those are all bells and whistles. You don't have do enable conversation or offer alternative distribution of your content, but it's nice. :-) --- In [email protected], "missbhavens1969" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Jebus--are we really going to do this again? This "Define Videoblog" thing? > I'm not saying > definitions aren't important, but y'all have been whacking each other over > the head with this > forever and no one's mind is going to get changed anytime soon, and that's > not necessarily a > bad thing. Passion is cool...beating a dead horse is pointless. > > Find a definition you like, hang onto it for awhile, see if it works for you, > be excited when it > morphs into something new, then go take a nap. > Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
