Re: [videoblogging] Re: Server stats question

[Markus Sandy]

same for AJAX, but both are certainly gaining traction i guess the question revolves around your parenthetical remark many people seem to think it's necessary to hit servers with smaller, but great numbered requests these days it's that "experience" thing i think ;) Andreas Haugstrup Pedersen wrote: On Fri, 17 Feb 2006 18:12:30 +0100, André Sala <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: But the problem, it seems, with BITS is that it makes a substantial number of webserver requests. If you look at your server log you might think that BITS is hammering your bandwidth because of the high number of requests. This is because it is making requests to the server for small chunks of a file rather than one request for the whole file itself. Once it has collected all of the bits of a file, it marks it as being finished and makes the file available to the user. Doesn't that create a substantial (and unnecessary) amount of overhead for the webserver to deal with? Why use this technology at all? - Andreas -- My name is Markus Sandy and I am app.etitio.us http://apperceptions.org http://digitaldojo.blogspot.com http://node101.org http://spinflow.org http://wearethemedia.com http://xpressionvlog.blogspot.com aim/ichat: [EMAIL PROTECTED] msn: [EMAIL PROTECTED] skype: msandy spin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] SPONSORED LINKS Individual Fireant Use YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS  Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web.    To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]    Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.