Josh, yer talking' apples and tangerines there.
Rocketboom is not what the majority of peeps are creating, from both
creative and business perspectives.
Your reply brings up the videoblogging definition matter - again.
And the flash matter - again.
We all get Rocketboom is different from drunk college kids' video.
We all get that flash quality, sometimes, is not as good as other
codecs.
The question in this thread is, again, can vids.myspace.com benefit
vloggers / vlogging.
On Mar 2, 2006, at 11:57 AM, Joshua Kinberg wrote:
> Just stating a fact. Their image quality looks bad.
>
> ...
>
> But in terms of audience... I would counter that Rocketboom gets a
> substantial regular audience (probably more so in frequency and return
> visits than any single vid in the MySpace/YouTube universe).
> Rocketboom is able to build a relationship with viewers ...
>
> ...
>
> Then again, a lot of people probably don't care that much about
> creative control or their own freedom.
>
> -Josh
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
