I think you could flip this question pretty easily and say:
"Does MySpace offer any benefit to bloggers?"
The answer may be a mixed bag... I'm not sure how much benefit MySpace
has to bloggers. But then again, there are a lot of people on MySpace
who probably don't care about such things.
-josh
On 3/2/06, robert a/k/a r <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Let's see if we can begin to figure it out.
>
> I thinks there are several questions.
>
> 1) What do videobloggers want most?
>
> 2) What does videoblogging need most?
>
> The first question is probably more complex in that personal
> preferences intersect with and sometimes dominate the group interest.
>
> Back to the first. Methinks there is a very large audience over at
> myspace who are inclined towards shared experiences such as video
> production / audience. If this thinking is true then those vloggers who
> want larger audiences probably have something to gain. Isn't it easier
> to meet people if you venture beyond your clique sometimes?
>
> Seems sometimes it would benefit vloggers if we (a) encouraged the
> service providers who are non-native this group to participate, and (b)
> encouraged vloggers to experiment with, or at a minimum intellectually
> examine, alternative arenas.
>
> Regarding the second question, the group interest, it would be cool to
> hear from one of the vlogfathers. Does vids.myspace.com offer any
> benefit to vlogging / vloggers?
>
>
>
>
> On Mar 2, 2006, at 12:39 PM, Joshua Kinberg wrote:
>
> >> The question in this thread is, again, can vids.myspace.com benefit
> >> vloggers / vlogging.
> >
> > What do you think? How do you see it as benefiting vloggers/vlogging?
> > Perhaps its good promotion for your content? I'm not really sure.
> >
> > Is it part of the shared ecosystem of the blogosphere? Doesn't really
> > look like it. But maybe that's just my narrowminded opinion.
> >
> > :-)
> >
> > -Josh
> >
> >
> > On 3/2/06, robert a/k/a r <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> Josh, yer talking' apples and tangerines there.
> >>
> >> Rocketboom is not what the majority of peeps are creating, from both
> >> creative and business perspectives.
> >>
> >> Your reply brings up the videoblogging definition matter - again.
> >>
> >> And the flash matter - again.
> >>
> >> We all get Rocketboom is different from drunk college kids' video.
> >>
> >> We all get that flash quality, sometimes, is not as good as other
> >> codecs.
> >>
> >> The question in this thread is, again, can vids.myspace.com benefit
> >> vloggers / vlogging.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On Mar 2, 2006, at 11:57 AM, Joshua Kinberg wrote:
> >>
> >>> Just stating a fact. Their image quality looks bad.
> >>>
> >>> ...
> >>>
> >>> But in terms of audience... I would counter that Rocketboom gets a
> >>> substantial regular audience (probably more so in frequency and
> >>> return
> >>> visits than any single vid in the MySpace/YouTube universe).
> >>> Rocketboom is able to build a relationship with viewers ...
> >>>
> >>> ...
> >>>
> >>> Then again, a lot of people probably don't care that much about
> >>> creative control or their own freedom.
> >>>
> >>> -Josh
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Yahoo! Groups Links
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> > Yahoo! Groups Links
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
