I may be splitting hairs here, but the author lists "Public Domain" as a type of CC license. But I don' think that this is the case. I thought that Public Domain was a part of standard copyright law. Am I wrong about this?
But I do see his point on the definitions of commercial. I would suspect that most users would consider commercial use to be used in a way that directly makes a profit for the publisher. Like directly selling copies of the work, or used as the primary content in a for- profit venture. A website with ads isn't always a for-profit venture. But I agree that the commercial concept is pretty fuzzy. But I don't believe that anyone would consider a link to a resume to be an ad as he suggests. Bill Streeter LO-FI SAINT LOUIS www.lofistl.com --- In [email protected], Markus Sandy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I think this article may be of interest to many videobloggers: > http://www.sourcelabs.com/blogs/ajb/2006/02/creative_commons_is_broke n.html > (here too: > swik.net/User:alex/Alex+Bosworth% 27s+Weblog/Creative+Commons+Is+Broken) > > > There is also a lively discussion about this taking place on the > cc_license mailing list > http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/cc-licenses > > > Perhaps this would make a good topic of discussion for the next > videobloggers video conference > http://www.voxmedia.org/wiki/Videoblogger_Videoconferences > Got any good stories related to Creative Commons Licensing? > Come share them in about 9 hours. > If you are normally asleep then, stop what you are doing and go to sleep > now so you'll be up for the conference ;) > > > markus > > -- > > > http://apperceptions.org > http://digitaldojo.blogspot.com > http://node101.org > aim/ichat: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
