around the 7/3/06 wtrainbow mentioned about [videoblogging] Re: is creative commons broken? that: >Who gave CC a mandate to create these licenses anyway? What's the >difference in having >a CC license and just stating your intent on your site (e.g. Please >feel free to use my work >in any way you see fit but if you make any money from it I require >10% of gross revenue >and a foot massage)
because it is backed up by a legal team willing to take someone to court to maintain this right if someone doesn't do what you say in your copy right agreement. -- cheers Adrian Miles this email is bloggable [ ] ask first [ ] private [x] hypertext.RMIT <URL:http://hypertext.rmit.edu.au/admin/briefEmail.html > Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
