And because standards help make things understandable. There are three audiences in mind for each CC license: - humans - lawyers - robots
These three constituents don't speak the same language, and thus CC provides standard templates with translations that can be read by each party. -Josh On 3/8/06, Adrian Miles <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > around the 7/3/06 wtrainbow mentioned about [videoblogging] Re: is > creative commons broken? that: > >Who gave CC a mandate to create these licenses anyway? What's the > >difference in having > >a CC license and just stating your intent on your site (e.g. Please > >feel free to use my work > >in any way you see fit but if you make any money from it I require > >10% of gross revenue > >and a foot massage) > > because it is backed up by a legal team willing to take someone to > court to maintain this right if someone doesn't do what you say in > your copy right agreement. > -- > cheers > Adrian Miles > this email is bloggable [ ] ask first [ ] private [x] > hypertext.RMIT <URL:http://hypertext.rmit.edu.au/admin/briefEmail.html > > > > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > > > > > Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
